> Regarding PESA you are correct. Villa Europa, through Sienicki, claims
that PESA is a legitimate arbitrational institute. We have presented
evidence in the case that we believe shows that PESA is not a legitimate
arbitrational institute. The Court shall weigh the evidence presented
in the case, so if Sienicki has not presented sufficient material to
show that PESA is legitimate that is a good thing for us.

> Regarding if the fabrication of documents constitutes a crime by
Sienicki, it could constitute the crime fabrication of records. The
sentence for this crime can at most be two years of prison. If it is gross
falsification of records the sentence can at most be six years of prison.

> The prosecutor and the police are independent authorities. However,
as you can see in the decision from the police it is the prosecutor that
retries the police decision to discontinue an investigation. Therefore,
a prosecutor will be involved in managing your writ to retry the decision
from the police.

> The Court of Appeal has not yet ruled in the case. Therefore, a ruling
from the court of appeal in our favor can strengthen the grounds for
fabrication of records. As previously stated, at this point we claim
that the documentation is fabricated while Villa Europa and Sienicki
claims that the documentation is valid.

> Regarding Kronofogden, I've noticed some interesting points from
> the material provided by Villa Europa in their latest written opinion
> (appendix 5 is the decision from Kronofogden). This is not based on an
> arbitrational award and PESA is not mentioned whatsoever. It seems to
> be a European payment order from a public court in Poland. Furthermore,
> from the screenshots you provided (IMG_2851) there is a bank account
> number that Villa Europa has provided.

When you say "from a public court in Poland", is this then a real court?

> Regarding the physical existence of PESA, if it only exists at
Sienicki's home office, this shows that it is not a legitimate arbitration
institute. However, I don't believe there is any formal requirement for
a physical address for an arbitration court.

> We have currently worked approximately 58 hours in the case. However,
Thomas always decides about the reasonable amount we shall invoice when
we invoice for the worked hours. We have so far invoiced the University
90 000 SEK (without VAT) on account.

> I suggest that you either call the police or send an email
(registrator.stockholm@polisen.se) to ask about the status of your
request. You can then give them the number of the investigation
5000-K174994-23.