OPINION IN CASE NO O 12191-22

VILLA EUROPE Sp. z o. o. us AXEL BRANDENBURG

The appellant regrets that the Swedish language could have been affected during the search process.
In favor of the defendant from 11 October 2o23 I answer.
Contents went the answer:

1. Answers and criticisms regarding the defendant's actual costs.
2. Summary of the coroner's costs.
3. Brief summary of mal O 12191.

Review and criticism of the defendant's costs

The defendant stands by its previous position regarding the defendant's costs.
We accept and request documentation of the defendant's costs has been completely ignored.
The defendant has reason to request documentation of the defendant's costs
in the form of invoices and/or other documents. Onus probandi for the
costs are on the defendant's side. In the latest letter, the defendant
has once again presented a good and undetermined list of supported costs'
the agent has not submitted an invoice (one legal document according to
the commercial law), for which the added cost was the agent's service
cannot be accepted. The unprofessional preparation of the defendant's
costs prevents the writ from that 8e a factual response. In addition,
the lack of legal documents makes it so impossible, the court ordered
rdtwist to assess the costs. Defendant's taking a stand also does not
consider or specify how the court should settle VAT (including VAT),
which does not constitute a cost for the company or the agent's company.
We are sorry for the lack of a professional and documented account of
costs frfr.n the defendant. Within the professional legal business uses
the parties invoices issued according to accounting principles, instead
of vaguely defined ones "documents" and/or "letters" called costs'1
Howdtten has the right and obligation to decide the interest based on
documents and de related claims that the parties have. The transcripts
that the client has submitted were not documents for performed legal
services. Despite earlier request from a customer has the defendant
not submitted such documents as e.g. A word about legal service, which
would contain important information such as the scope of the service,
the payment terms, deadlines and other details that are connected to
the execution of services. Showing such a speech about legal services would undoubtedly be possible
a real examination of the trend's scope and extent for both the ktrend and
the court. Without such a date, talk of legal services moves both customers and
the court in a world of speculation and conjecture.
Reliable documentation, in the form of invoices for lawyers, invoices for
the expert opinion and other costs related to the appeal process' play a role
significant role in cost control in Sweden. The appellate court and/or a party
(as the korand did) can request a s dan documentation for a thorough
evaluation and accounting of the costs and to make sure that they
has really arisen in connection with the legal process. This upprdtth ller
transparency and honesty when it comes to travel costs, which is important
b they went to the parties and the trial itself.
In light of the above request, I reject the defendant's current and previous requests
application to determine the root of rooting costs to his form. Defendant's
the request for &reimbursement of costs has not been proven if it is worth and
extent.

Summary of wedge rand costs.
Kdranden supplements and presents pro forma invoices regarding previous and
current costs in the órende Ó rzr9r. Pro forma invoices for these costs
attached to this letter. The total cost in this answer amounts to 48,818.68
Euro. When determining the costs to fcjrm n for the customer, binds himself
the order to execute and lease the companies that performed services to the order to execute
standard invoices to the defendant.

Short summary.
1. The parties ! the previous procedure, Villa Europa and Herr Axel Brandenburg, included a
written disagreement on Mstlósning (if s.d.ana upst r) through
arbitration proceedings.e. The parties disagreed on the arbitration procedure. A dispute arose
payment between the parties for a service performed by Vi]la Europa &t Herr
Brandenburg.
2. The service consisted of participating in a scientific conference organized by
the journal and publishing services in the form of recording, editing and
publication (open public access) of the defendant's submission. The service
was carried out in a professional manner and approved by Brandenburg.
3. The arbitration was conducted in accordance with the arbitration
clause agreed upon by the parties ar,spoken The parties had access to
all necessary procedural rights during the arbitration proceedings
(effective written notices, actual participation in the procedure,
information about the parties' rights from the arbitration and possibility
to appeal arbitration awards). The arbitration was conducted accordingly
with fundamentally radical and progressive principles that are considered
to be necessary for a rd.twis and rdttssdker rdttsordning in Sweden,
Poland and the EU.
4. After the conclusion of the arbitration proceedings, the arbitrator
issued an award.
5. In the arbitration clause of the agreement, the defendant confirmed
in writing his willingness to resolve disputes (if they arise) through
arbitration. For the current progress the defendant unwarranted
and dubious p&stances in order not to pay for tj almost entered the
Hovrdtten in Stockholm. It only shows that the defendant intended since
the customer had no intention of paying for the service, the Defendant's
statement behavior is fundamentally incompatible with the general order
(ordre public) in Sweden, Poland and the EU.
6. According to Swedish rdttslóra and Swedish practice, the operation
of a foreign arbitration is only denied if enforcement would cause them
the most suspicion the basic beliefs about morality are human and/or
human rights. Undoubtedly, the granting of payment would be an issue
and authorized service not to question or be able to question morals
and ethics in Sweden, Poland and the EU.
7. Sweden, like many other countries including Poland, has a pro-
arbitration setting in its legal system and attaches great importance to
finality and enforceability of arbitral awards.
B. Therefore, I agree that the arbitration decision on recognition and
enforceability i the goal must be determined.
9. I request that the costs be awarded to the client (as described above
in point z, the gross amount) before the procedure was introduced by
Howdtten in Stockholm.

Warsaw day as above.
Professor dr hab. Krzysztof Sienicki
Appendix 1: Proforma invoices

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Footnote 1:
The reason carried out an analysis of the registered working time of
the defendant's representative with hj i|p of Benford's a|lmónna |ag
(see ti|| example| Wikipedia). This team mój|iggór preoccupied with
deviations, that we|| s iga opó|it|it|it reports' According to Benford's
Iag, the number is 5 pó third place will occur with a probability
of 10.0%. The agent's costs are included the one with a probability of
48%. At the same time, the number 5 should appear in the second place with
a probability according to Benford's |ag pó 9.7%o, not like the agent's
costs with a probability of 36%' The enormous difference between expected
(according to Benford's law) and observed probability of the occurrence
of the number "5" clearly points to the number "5" above origin in the
defendant's attorney's work report. Apparently the defendant's counsel
likes the number "5". IN fa||et with the 'costs'. as stated by the agent
in writing since 25 May 2023, the number "5" occurs in the third place
with a probability of 43% and 10% (according to Benford's company). The
difference between 10% and 43% is huge and once again confirms the figure
The unusual origin of the "5" in the defendant's counsel's work report.