Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2024 15:16:28 +0100 From: Axel Brandenburg To: Rusiecka Monika Subject: Re: Pan-Europejski-Sad-Arbitrazowy, Villa Europa Dear Ms Monika Rusiecka, Thank you very much for your response. I'm considering myself only as an observer or a witness. In this case, the Swedish Court of Appeal reacted on a letter from a private person (Krzysztof Sienicki, PESEL 54110105115) who presented evidence that Pan-Europejski-Sad-Arbitrazowy exists and that a judge, Anna Martyniuk (PESEL unknown), issued a verdict. How should the legitimacy of Pan-Europejski-Sad-Arbitrazowy or the existence of Anna Martyniuk have been clarified? Whom could the Swedish Court of Appeal have consulted back in April 2022? I would be grateful for any suggestion that you could think of that would ease the communication between Swedish and Polish authorities. A related question concerns the legitimacy of Polish invoices that have no valid NIP (or VAT) number. In Poland, this would be illegal and such an invoice must not be paid. In the case of a victim from Gävle, Kronofogden has made such a payment to Sienicki. Regards, Axel Brandenburg On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 01:07:36PM +0000, Rusiecka Monika wrote: > Dear Sir, > > The consul does not act as a lawyer or representative, especially in > the case of a person who is not a Polish citizen thus we cannot pass > any information to, as you write: "inform politicians, journalists, > and others about this case". > > You took legal action and you are working with your lawyers and courts > in Sweden and Poland and you will continue so. > > We have no further knowledge about the case in question. > > Regards, > > Monika Rusiecka > Konsul > Wydział Konsularny > Ambasada Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej w Sztokholmie > Prästgårdsgatan 5, 172 32 Sundbyberg > https://www.gov.pl/web/szwecja > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ambasada RP w Sztokholmie – Wydział Konsularny > Sent: Thursday, February 29, 2024 1:24 PM > To: Rusiecka Monika > Subject: FW: Pan-Europejski-Sad-Arbitrazowy, Villa Europa > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ambasada RP w Sztokholmie - Info > Sent: Thursday, February 29, 2024 12:59 PM > To: Ambasada RP w Sztokholmie – Wydział Konsularny > Subject: Pan-Europejski-Sad-Arbitrazowy, Villa Europa > > Cześć Ania, > > Przekazujemy do wiadomości poniższy mail: > Pozdrawiam, > Ania > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Axel Brandenburg > Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2024 7:19 PM > To: Ambasada RP w Sztokholmie - Info > Subject: Re: Pan-Europejski-Sad-Arbitrazowy, Villa Europa > > To the Embassy of the Republic of Poland, > > I emailed you last year about Krzysztof Sienicki from Podkowa Lesna, who > created his own court! This was reported in Dagens Juridik on Wednesday > (attached). The story has also been reported in Science, one of the top > journals in all fields of science. There was a new story last Friday: > > https://www.science.org/content/article/covid-19-scientists-who-faced-huge-bills-after-speaking-webinars-win-court > https://www.science.org/content/article/costly-invite-scientists-hit-with-massive-bills-after-speaking-at-covid-19-conferences > > I feel that the cases have a political dimension in Sweden. When > Svea Hovratt decided on 20 December 2022 to approve the application > of Krzysztof Sienicki to enforce a verdict by the Pan-European Court > (PESA), the decision was based on just a single source of information - > contrary to good practice in journalism to always consult more than one > source. Svea Hovratt never checked whether PESA or Villa Europa exist. > > My lawyers explained that Svea Hovratt is not required to do any > investigation on their own, so this is a loop hole in the Swedish justice > system. This is why I'm talking about a political dimension requiring > contact with politicians to work toward a change in legislation. Other > countries, especially Italy, but apparently also Norway, seem more robust > against such exploitation of their citizens. > > Let me also say that, separately from the civil cases at Svea Hovratt, > I have been trying to press criminal charges against Sienicki (Chapter 15, > §11 and Chapter 14, §1 of the Swedish Criminal Code for having presented > falsified evidence in court [osant intygande and urkundsförfalskning]) > both in Sweden and in Poland. It should have been the responsibility > of Svea Hovratt to do this, but they didn't. Both in Sweden and in > Poland, the investigations were initially closed. In Poland, my appeal > was approved on January 24, 2024, and in Sweden, the decision is still > pending. > > I would be grateful if you could help informing politicians, > journalists, and others about this case. Let me know if you need more > information. > > Your sincerely, > Axel Brandenburg > 19590407-8317 > > On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 11:47:53AM +0200, Axel Brandenburg wrote: > > To the Embassy of the Republic of Poland, > > > > I wrote you on April 3, and hope you received my email alright. In the > > meantime, I was put in touch with a lawyer in Poland; see below. In > > his letter, he gives a link to a similar case which is described in > > Polish. There, it says that the defendants face 10 years in prison for > > making false statements to the court. I think it is important to > > realize this investigation has an international character. This case > > might not go forward unless the evidence is brought forward to the > > state prosecutor. This requires the help of a lawyer, but my role in > > this is only that of one of several witnesses. I don't plan to pay the > > lawyer from my own funds, although I would be disappointed to see this > > case grounding to a halt at this point. Let me know if you have any suggestions. > > > > Your sincerely, > > Axel Brandenburg > > > > Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2023 12:28:41 +0200 > > From: "r.pr. dr Piotr Łebek" > > To: Axel Brandenburg > > Cc: Michael Erici , Thomas > > Ekenberg , Dariusz Hryniów > > > > Subject: Re: introducing you to each other > > > > Dear Axel, > > Dear Michael, > > Dear Thomas, > > > > Thank you for a very fruitful meeting. To sum up, the most important > > topics (Key points - KP) that we talked about: > > > > 1. At this stage of the case, it is advisable to focus on the > > prosecutor to boost his effort and present the case as a high-profile > > case and make an association with the case of, e.g. Petro Invest Plus > > S.A. (KP 1). I enclosed the link to the case, but please ‘google-translate’ it. > > > > https://businessinsider.com.pl/wiadomosci/na-podstawie-fikcyjnych-wyro > > kow-wyludzili-ze-spolek-23-mln-zl-dziesiec-osob-uslyszalo/xzj1srf > > > > 2. The investigation had an international character. The case also > > involved the citizens of Estonia and Finland and was about arbitration > > awards that did not exist (Damage PLN 23 M). During the case, the > > prosecutor*, inter alia*, secured the assets of the suspected. (KP 2) > > > > 3. The criminal case is the cheapest way not only to finish the case > > but to gain additional information for the purpose of civil cases. I > > believe that at the right time and moment, having in mind the pended > > case in Sweden, the civil claim can be submitted; however, only if we > > gain knowledge that the award will be enforceable, i.e. we will be > > able to get back the costs of the case. The award is not per se a > > purpose, but it is an economical substitute. (KP 3) > > > > 4. To omit problems with a corporate veil of VILLA Europa, we will > > focus on the arbiter, however, in the scope of our interest are also, > > among others, Krzysztof Sienicki. The crime group is at stake, > > including the virtual arbitrators. This fact increases the potential > > interest of the prosecutor. > > > > 5. Finally, the idea is to make qualification of the criminal offence > > in a way that the prosecutor shall act not only as a revision but as the > > leading body. (KP 4) > > > > 6. The agenda is as follows: > > > > *Phase I: ‘New opening’ (April, 21 to May, 31)* > > > > Step 1: Empowerment to represent you against the prosecutor (no later > > than April, 21) > > > > Step 2: Contact the prosecutor (no later than April, 28) > > > > Step 3: The revision of steps 1- 2 (no later than May, 8) > > > > Step 4: (1) Submission with evidence and narration supporting > > high-profile case (Petro Invest Plus case) (2) contact with other > > victims (no later than May, 31) > > > > Step 5: Testimonies against the prosecutor (no later than May, 31) > > > > Step 6: The revision of steps 1- 4 (no later than Jun, 1) > > > > > > *Phase II: ‘Development’ (Jun, 1 - )* > > > > (the steps shall be determined after steps 1- 4; however, the KP’s > > are: (1) set an appropriate pace for the prosecutor and present an > > active attitude to get as much information as it is possible (2) gain > > prosecutor asset warranty, (3) present conclusion from award > > dismissing the enforcement of the award (if the case shall be closed) > > (4) broaden the group of victims > > (5) civil claims. > > > > 7. The cost: > > > > *A. the hour rate:* > > > > 1. EURO 100,00 net per hour (steps 1-3) > > > > 2. EURO 150,00 net per hour (steps 4 - ) > > > > *CAP:* No more than 100 hours (Phase I) [no more than EURO 15,000 net] > > > > *B. the full refund:* of incurred cost (e.g. transportation) / You > > shall be informed about app. cost before incurrence. > > > > *The CAP for Phase II shall be determined after Step 6* > > > > > > All the best > > > > Piotr, > > > > wt., 18 kwi 2023 o 10:13 Axel Brandenburg > > napisał(a): > > > > > Dear Piotr, > > > It was good talking to you yesterday. I did talk to Adam Krolikowski > > > earlier today, but he wasn't ready to speak in English, so he asked > > > me to have a Polish speaking person talking to him. Thus, even now > > > that you are not yet officially representing me yet, you could > > > actually call him, if you think this is useful at this point. His > > > number is > > > +48 477 24 28 36. The case number is PP PL 129+23. > > > What do you think? > > > Axel > > > > On Mon, Apr 03, 2023 at 08:04:35AM +0200, Axel Brandenburg wrote: > > > To the Embassy of the Republic of Poland, > > > > > > I called you on Wednesday (March 29) in this matter, which concerns > > > a series of organized fraud cases involving a company in Warsaw with > > > the name "Villa Europa" and an arbitrational institution with the > > > name "Pan-Europejski-Sad-Arbitrazowy". You kindly suggested that I > > > send you a letter with the relevant details, which I am doing > > > herewith as an attached pdf file along with supporting material (material_Embassy_Stockholm.zip). > > > > > > Your sincerely, > > > Axel Brandenburg > >